OCA TaoP

OCA degree in photography module 1

The Art of the Troubles

  In previous posts I have indicated the difficulty that I have with art. A recent exhibition at the ulster museum, entitled “The Art of the Troubles” has helped me achieve a greater appreciation and understanding of Art. One of my main issues was only connecting with art on the aesthetic level.

Around 6 years ago (when I was first developing an interest in photography) I went to see a an exhibition by Willie Docherty entitled Apparatus which is comprised of 40 aluminium panel prints of areas impacted and ghettoised during the troubles. I was incredibly underwhelmed and angry. I felt cheated that this guy was passing off dull snapshots of waste ground or damaged buildings as art and cashing in on the political situation in Northern Ireland. I thought that art (and good photography) had to be pretty and I didn’t understand the value of context to an art piece and how art is informed by other work.

The art of the troubles is a collection of paintings, photos, sculpture installations and video in which artists responded to the troubles or referenced elements of the political culture in northern Ireland during that period. I went into the exhibition with my ingrained preconceptions and bigotry ( I don’t care who you are but if you are over 30 and from northern Ireland you will have a certain amount of ingrained bigotry and intolerance). Within 10 minutes those preconceptions were blown away and even my inner bigot had to take a back seat. Here were artworks that I could appreciate because I understand the context and symbolism used.

The works had quite an effect on me I felt elated that the scales had dropped from my eyes but they also stirred memories and experiences that I had not thought about for a long time. Events and experiences from my childhood came to the surface and I was close to tears at several points in the gallery.

There was a lot of photography in the exhibition. Photos of the maze prison by Donavan Wiley. Some of Paul Seawright’s work showing the locations of violent murders. Scanogaphy of the knives used by the Shankill Butchers to torture and kill their victims and some of Willie Docherty’s images. One of Docherty’s photos in particular struck me because it was so similar to the images I had derided 6 years earlier. It was a photograph of burned out car. It was a type of image that I had seen hundreds of times over the 30 years of the troubles. Cars were stolen to commit robberies, transport guns or explosives, to be used as getaway cars after attacks on the police or members of the other community, or simply for joy riding. These cars would then be burned to destroy any forensic evidence. In this case the photo had been staged by Docherty and by doing this he was bringing into question the journalistic practices in use during the conflict in Northern Ireland.

My tutor has told me that I need to get more feeling into my work and this experience has shown me how artists imbue their work with feeling but also how that work can evoke feelings in others. I visited the exhibition three times. The first time was on my own, then with my partner and lastly with my children ( who are 20 and 16). By doing this I was shown that experiencing art can depend on many things. My partner was brought up in a different area of Belfast and so her experience of the time was different from mine. My son and daughter are not old enough to remember the troubles and so they had no context on which to hang the artwork. I was able to take them around the work explaining some of my experiences growing up and how they informed my view of the different pieces, but it was also very heartening to find that my kids don’t have the bitterness and bigotry that are still (although very diluted) with me.

art of the Troubles small-3008

 

What is Art?

I’m currently reading “the photograph as contemporary art” by Charlotte Cotton. It’s one of the required reading books to the course and it has been a struggle. The reason it has been a struggle is because I don’t understand art. I am hoping by the end of this Bachelor of Arts degree that I may understand art little bit more. I come from east Belfast working-class roots, and as such my initial reaction when being presented with modern or contemporary art would be “how can that be art it’s just a pile of bricks” or “how can that be art, it’s just an unmade bed ” or “how can that be art, it’s just half a cow in formaldehyde”, et cetera. This book is starting to bring me round to believing the value of contemporary art, as it began to explain some of the meaning behind the photographers’ work and then I came across the work of Peter Fischli and David Weiss Quiet afternoon (Cotton 2001, P 114) (the image can also be seen here). Which prompted the response “how can this be art, it’s just a courgette balanced on a carrot balanced on a cheese grater”. The image actually made me feel angry and had me wondering who is in charge of quality control in the art world. Coincidentally Grayson Perry is the lecturer for this year’s reflectors Reeth lecturers. His first lecture was dedicated to this subject and can be found here and is well worth a listen. What I’ve gleaned from this is, art is decided by dealers, curators, collectors, gallery owners, experts, committees and the people who award the Turner prize or the Venice Biennale (the art Olympics). The Turner prize exhibition was in Northern Ireland this year so I was able to go and see it. Some of the nominees work was quite accessible but I found Laure Prouvost’s installation completely bewildering. Again my reaction is “How can this be art” and I rage against the answer, it’s art because people who know more about art than I do say its art. Part of this is about change. I am frightened that if I start to understand the work of Prouvoust or Emmin or Hurst or Fisschli and Wiess then I will have changed into some kind of artsy fartsy elitist who can’t actually see that the Emperor is completely naked, when in fact I was previously the little boy who would have spotted it straight away.

Reference List

Cotton, C 2004, the photograph as contemporary art, London: Thames and Hudson Freeman, M 2007, The Photographer's Eye, Lewes: ILEX

Shore, S 2007, The Nature of Photographs: a Primer, 2nd ed. London: Phaidon

Mulvey, L. 1999. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema.

Tate.org.uk. 2006. Fischli & Weiss: exhibition room guide, room 3 | Tate. [online] Available at: Http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/fischli-weiss/fischli-weiss-room-guide-room-1/fischli-weiss [Accessed: 16 Mar 2014].

Gursky, A. n.d. 99 Cents. [online] Available at: http://www.artinasia.com/img/event/20326-21af0deebafbb66d8da33a498f100361.jpg [Accessed: 22 Mar 2014].

Tate.org.uk. 1999. 'The Rhine II', Andreas Gursky | Tate. [online] Available at: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gursky-the-rhine-ii-p78372 [Accessed: 22 Mar 2014].

Tate.org.uk. 1995. 'Centre Georges Pompidou', Andreas Gursky | Tate. [online] Available at: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gursky-centre-georges-pompidou-p11675 [Accessed: 22 Mar 2014].

Leibovitz, A. and Sontag, S. 1999. Women. New York: Random House.

Cartier Bresson, H., 2014. Magnum Photos. [online] Magnumphotos.com. Available at: <http://www.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&VBID=2K1HZOQXFIV50I&SMLS=1&RW=1920&RH=955> [Accessed 21 Apr. 2014].

Freeman, M. (1990). Film. London: Collins.

Freeman, M. (2013). The colour photography field guide. 1st ed. Lewes, U.K.: Ilex.

Freeman, M. (2014). Capturing light: The heart of photography. 1st ed. Lewes, U.K.: Ilex.

Hunter, F., Fuqua, P. and Biver, S. (2011). Light-- science and magic. Waltham, MA: Focal Press.

Präkel, D. (2007). Lighting. Lusanne [u.a.]: AVA Book.

Frank, R. and Kerouac, J. (2008). The Americans. Gottingen: Steidl.

Sontag, S. (1979). On photography. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Gutherie, W. (1945). This land is your land. [record].

Time Management and Motivation

It would appear that I have underestimated the amount of work needed to complete a degree. I have had the course materials for three weeks my and this is my second blog post. The difficulty of working full-time and studying in a self disciplined manner, rather than going to scheduled classes, is proving challenging. I find myself procrastinating rather than getting down to doing some serious work. I am also all a little frightened to start the exercises in case I get it wrong. I am starting to suffer from analysis paralysis. Actually it's more like second-guessing and doubting myself before I even start. In previous experiences of studying photography, at a level and GCSE, I would wait until the very last minute and then cram a years worth of work into the last month to study. Looking at what needs to be done at least they have realised that I cannot do that at degree level.

I have set myself the goal of completing the introductory exercises by the end of October (today is 22 October 2013).